[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: org-table-sum
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: org-table-sum |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:27:03 +0200 |
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 01:07:22 +0200, Jeremie Juste
>>>>> <jeremiejuste@gmail.com> said:
Jeremie> Hello,
Jeremie> Thanks for the input.
Jeremie> From what I understand, it seems that org-table-sum is not
behaving as
Jeremie> expected. I don't know if it would be interesting to split the
function
Jeremie> into 2. One for summing of time values and one for summing
integers?
I suspect that the people using org-table sum would not want to split
the function in two: itʼs a useful utility function (and why split off
the integer summing? Thatʼs always going to be accurate).
Jeremie> For the sum of integers (possibly real numbers) it might be
interesting
Jeremie> to make a function use TBLFM directly?
You could make org-table-sum use calc, which would achieve the same. I
donʼt think there'd be any complaints about floating-point additions
suddenly being more accurate (famous last words)
Robert
--
Re: org-table-sum, Eric S Fraga, 2020/09/25