Re: [feature request] org-at-timestamp-p should accept multiple parameters

[Adam Faryna]

Thanks. I understand now.

I think to generate a patch in this case it's too much hustle, for a minor benefit.

--

Adam

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:13, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

Hi Adam,

Adam Faryna <adamfaryna@gmail.com> writes:

> Ok, maybe I misunderstood the purpose of this function. I wanted to
> use it to check if the timestamp is active or inactive and I tried to
> get it by using (org-at-timestamp-p 'inactive) while pointing at the
> timestamp. But actually when I call it on any timestamp like
> [2020-09-04 Fri], <2020-09-04 Fri> I always get nil. So either it's a
> bug, or I miss something.

(org-at-timestamp-p) returns t on an active timestamp.

(org-at-timestamp-p 'inactive) returns t on any timestamp, including
inactive ones.

If you think the docstring could be enhanced, can you share a patch?

See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html on how to contribute.

Thanks,

--
 Bastien