[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?
From: |
Greg Minshall |
Subject: |
Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails? |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:45:18 -0700 |
Nicolas,
thank you. wordsmithing opens up endless possibilities, so i don't know
that the following is at all an improvement on your suggestion. but, it
occurs to me to get the importance of =noweb-ref=, and its role in
concatenation, brought out early on the "page".
one paragraph currently reads:
----
Org can replace the Noweb style reference with the source code---or
concatenation thereof---, or even the results of an evaluation, as
detailed below. The =noweb= header argument controls expansion of Noweb
syntax references. Expansions occur when source code blocks are
evaluated, tangled, or exported.
----
an alternative:
----
Depending on the setting of the =noweb= header argument, Org will either
ignore a Noweb style reference, or will attempt to replace it. In the
latter case, the replacement text will be either the source code from
exactly *one* named source code block (using either a #+name: line, or a
=noweb-ref= header argument), or a concatentation of one or more source
code blocks, each with an identically named =noweb-ref= header argument.
Expansions can only occur when source code blocks are evaluated,
tangled, or exported. For more details, see below.
----
again, thanks. cheers, Greg
- babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Greg Minshall, 2020/04/19
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/19
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Greg Minshall, 2020/04/19
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/19
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Greg Minshall, 2020/04/19
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/20
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?,
Greg Minshall <=
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/22
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Greg Minshall, 2020/04/22
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/22
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Greg Minshall, 2020/04/22
- Re: babel/noweb concatenation of equally-named code blocks fails?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/23