Re: [SOLVED] Re: [PATCH] Show hidden drawers when org-cycle on headlines

[Ihor Radchenko]

> Yes, this `integrate' value is not great, IMO. However, plain lists have
> much more in common with headlines than with drawers.
>
> I still think basic cycling should not include drawers whatsoever. This
> is even more true for properties drawers.

I tend to agree about the properties drawers. Cannot come up with a
reasonable use-case for such kind of behaviour.
However, I have some use-case for cycling user-defined property drawers.

In some of my entries, I have long tables storing historical data.
These tables tend to be extremely long and I sometimes hide them inside
a drawer. Opening these drawers (or a customised list of drawers) on
<TAB> would actually make sense for me. 


Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Ihor Radchenko <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Thanks Ihor, I indeed found related code in Org Mode source. I implemented a
>>> similar functionality in my patch.
>>
>> Oh. I somehow missed your first message...
>>
>> Now, actually adding something to the discussion.
>>
>> FYI, there is org-cycle-include-plain-lists variable. If it is set to
>> 'integrate, plain lists will be included into cycling with point at
>> headline. This is against the logic that org-cycle only needs to be
>> dealing with headlines. So, I don't see your patch breaking the present
>> conventions in org.
>
> Yes, this `integrate' value is not great, IMO. However, plain lists have
> much more in common with headlines than with drawers.
>
> I still think basic cycling should not include drawers whatsoever. This
> is even more true for properties drawers.
>
> Note that you can already display drawers with `org-cycle', using three
> prefix arguments.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou

-- 
Ihor Radchenko,
PhD,
Center for Advancing Materials Performance from the Nanoscale (CAMP-nano)
State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong 
University, Xi'an, China
Email: address@hidden, address@hidden