[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2020 20:01:32 -0400 |
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:13 PM Joost Kremers <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07 2020, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > While I of course can't speak for John, I would hope and expect
> > org
> > ref to support the new syntax.
> >
> > I would hope and expect the same of other packages (like ebib)
> > that
> > use their own custom syntax.
>
> Ebib maintainer here. I would certainly include support in Ebib
> for any citation syntax that Org would adopt.
>
> What would help, BTW, is if there's an easy way to find out what
> the bibliography file or files are that are associated with the
> current Org buffer.
I guess the simplest and most flexible option would be to specify the
bib file in the header?
So if present use that; otherwise use the global bib file(s) specified
in the init?
Bruce
- wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/07
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/07
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/08
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/08
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, John Kitchin, 2020/04/08
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/08
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Albert Krewinkel, 2020/04/09
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/09
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/09
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/09
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/09