Re: noweb

[Nick Dokos]

"Fraga, Eric" <address@hidden> writes:

> My approach to this is to create three blocks that are tangled and a
> separate block (or more than one if you have different tests you want to
> perform) for evaluation that references those three blocks (via noweb)
> but is not tangled.

That works, but shouldn't Nuno's approach with :noweb eval work? What use
is it to include unexpanded noweb markers in the tangled output?

-- 
Nick

"There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache
invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors." -Martin Fowler