emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?


From: Alan E. Davis
Subject: Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:16:25 -0700

I am using org-mode installed by the emacs package system: org-plus-contrib.  I just updated it this morning:

Org mode version 9.2.6 (9.2.6-elpaplus @ /usr/share/emacs/27.0.50/lisp/org/)

I have no trouble, so far, running this template.  If it is of interest, I am using this also in directories in my Dropbox folder, from my laptop and a desktop machine.  I will investigate changes in the template parameters.

I am already thinking of another one,  to capture a file listing and perhaps enable commenting.  That last bit will stymy me.  In fact it's all pretty much beyond me, for the moment.   I saw a contributed org function to do something similar. 

Anyway, for now, this template shows promise.  It's already easier to save quick notes about an ongoing project.  Before org-mode, I used steno.el, to good effect; org-mode, however, is lightyears beyond steno. 

Thank you for the comments. 

Alan Davis

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:51 AM Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> "AED" == Alan E Davis <address@hidden> writes:

   > I have come up with something simple that works:
   >     ("X" "ChangeLog README" entry (file+datetree "./00_README.org") "* %?
   > \n   %U \n %f" :prepend t)

Thanks I tried this and I obtain

Deprecated date/weektree capture templates changed to ‘file+olp+datetree’.
org-datetree--find-create: Buffer is read-only: #<buffer README.org<org>>



That is why I have only absolute paths in my capture templates, but I
find them no appropriate in certain circumstances.

Any idea what is wrong here?

Uwe Brauer


--
[Fill in the blanks]

The use of corrupt manipulations and blatant rhetorical ploys ...--- outright lying, flagwaving, personal attacks, setting up phony alternatives, misdirection, jargon-mongering, evading key issues, feigning disinterested objectivity, willful misunderstanding of other points of view---suggests that ... lacks both credibility and evidence.

             ---- Edward Tufte (in context of making presentations)
                                                                                                       

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]