emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] org-links for Gnus in imap with Gmail (for a convenient todo.org


From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Subject: Re: [O] org-links for Gnus in imap with Gmail (for a convenient todo.org list)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:43:23 +0200

Le jeu. 07/25/19 juil. 2019 à 04:47:14 , ??Fraga, Eric??

a envoyé ce message:
On Thursday, 25 Jul 2019 at 18:24, Joseph Vidal-Rosset wrote:
But for gnus-imap-gmail users, it is more difficult to get the same
thing.

>

[…]

>

But I need to change the mention of INBOX in the link to John?s
email.

>

Why is that? If I create a link to an email from gmail using %a, this
seems to work (having just tested it). Am I missing something?

Hi again Eric and everybody,

Considering the code:

;;capture todo items using C-c c t
(define-key global-map (kbd "C-c c") 'org-capture)
(setq org-capture-templates
      '(
	("t" "todo" entry (file+headline "~/Dropbox/Orgzly/todo.org" "Tasks")
         "* TODO [#A] %?\n [[~/Dropbox/Orgzly/links.org::%(org-insert-time-stamp (org-read-date nil t \"%:date\"))]] \n* %(org-insert-time-stamp (org-read-date nil t \"%:date\")) %a "
	 )
	)
      )

(defun hs/replace ()
   (interactive)
   (goto-char 1)
   (let ((search-invisible t)) (replace-string "gnus:INBOX#" "gnus:%5BGmail%5D/Tous les messages#")))
(define-key global-map (kbd "C-c r") 'hs/replace)
(add-hook 'org-capture-prepare-finalize-hook 'hs/replace)
(defun my/refile (file headline &optional arg)
  (let ((pos (save-excursion
               (find-file file)
               (org-find-exact-headline-in-buffer headline))))
    (org-refile arg nil (list headline file nil pos)))
  (switch-to-buffer (current-buffer)))

a better option would be to get in only one function org-capture-template
and hs/replace : if string « gnus/INBOX » exists, hs/replace works and
replaces the string, if not, the link is given without change. The
idea is simple, but I do not succeed to realize it, because I do not
know enough the syntax. But I would be surprised if this would be
impossible to make it.

Best wishes,


Joseph


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]