emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] recent org-mode changes: completion of repeated tasks reports "1


From: Daniel Ortmann
Subject: Re: [O] recent org-mode changes: completion of repeated tasks reports "10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today"
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:49:55 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0

Another task which gives the same message with SCHEDULED instead of DEADLINE; this one also uses "++" to repeat dates but with no "-0d".  The result looks correct; only the message is bothersome.

I replied to the message 'y' twice and then 'n' to test the resulting change.  Changes look fine:





From *Messages*:
10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today.  Continue? (y or n) y [2 times]
10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today.  Continue? (y or n) n
And later
Entry repeats: SCHEDULED: <2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d> Plain: [2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d] Plain: [2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d]


Here is the task:

** TODO one-on-one                                           :meeting:
   SCHEDULED: <2019-01-23 Wed 13:30-14:00 ++1w>
   :PROPERTIES:
   :LAST_REPEAT: [2019-01-17 Thu 10:39]
   :END:
   :LOGBOOK:
   - State "CANCELED"   from "TODO"       [2019-01-17 Thu 10:39]
   - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2019-01-09 Wed 14:14]
...
   :END:



On 1/15/19 8:43 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Daniel Ortmann <address@hidden> writes:

No other tasks.  Here is the complete text with only one url removed:

* TODO [#C] p6 time entry
  DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d>
  :PROPERTIES:
  :LAST_REPEAT: [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03]
  :END:
  :LOGBOOK:

<snip>

On 1/13/19 10:12 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:

    Daniel Ortmann <address@hidden> writes:

        I have a weekly scheduled task with ...
          DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d>
        
        Recently, when I complete the task it reports the following:
        
        Clock stopped at [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] after 0:05
        10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today. 
        Continue? (y or n) n
        
        Thoughts?
        
    Hi Daniel,
    
    Do you have some other repeating timestamp buried somewhere in that
    task?  It is probably moving that one forward and it is the one that
    needs more than 10 repeats to become current.
    
    There was a recent change that updates all repeating timestamps in the
    task.
    
    Regards,
    Bernt
Sorry I can't reproduce what you are seeing.

Regards,
Bernt




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]