|
From: | Daniel Ortmann |
Subject: | Re: [O] recent org-mode changes: completion of repeated tasks reports "10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today" |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:49:55 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 |
Another task which gives the same message with SCHEDULED instead of
DEADLINE; this one also uses "++" to repeat dates but with no
"-0d". The result looks correct; only the message is bothersome. I replied to the message 'y' twice and then 'n' to test the resulting change. Changes look fine: ![]() ![]() From *Messages*: 10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today. Continue? (y or n) y [2 times] 10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today. Continue? (y or n) n And later Entry repeats: SCHEDULED: <2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d> Plain: [2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d] Plain: [2019-01-17 Thu 07:50 .+1d] Here is the task: SCHEDULED: <2019-01-23 Wed 13:30-14:00 ++1w> :PROPERTIES: :LAST_REPEAT: [2019-01-17 Thu 10:39] :END: :LOGBOOK: - State "CANCELED" from "TODO" [2019-01-17 Thu 10:39] - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2019-01-09 Wed 14:14] ... :END: On 1/15/19 8:43 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Daniel Ortmann <address@hidden> writes:No other tasks. Here is the complete text with only one url removed: * TODO [#C] p6 time entry DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d> :PROPERTIES: :LAST_REPEAT: [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] :END: :LOGBOOK:<snip>On 1/13/19 10:12 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote: Daniel Ortmann <address@hidden> writes: I have a weekly scheduled task with ... DEADLINE: <2019-01-18 Fri ++1w -0d> Recently, when I complete the task it reports the following: Clock stopped at [2019-01-11 Fri 17:03] after 0:05 10 repeater intervals were not enough to shift date past today. Continue? (y or n) n Thoughts? Hi Daniel, Do you have some other repeating timestamp buried somewhere in that task? It is probably moving that one forward and it is the one that needs more than 10 repeats to become current. There was a recent change that updates all repeating timestamps in the task. Regards, BerntSorry I can't reproduce what you are seeing. Regards, Bernt |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |