[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Order of tangled blocks reversed?
From: |
Kaushal Modi |
Subject: |
[O] Order of tangled blocks reversed? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Oct 2018 02:56:22 -0400 |
Hello,
I was playing with Org Tangle header-args inheritance and came up with
this example:
=====
#+property: header-args :tangle yes
At Org level 0.
* Heading 1
:PROPERTIES:
:header-args: :tangle foo.el
:END:
At Org level 1.
#+name: block1
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(message "this will be tangled to property_drawer2.el")
#+end_src
** Heading 1.1
:PROPERTIES:
:header-args:emacs-lisp: :tangle no
:END:
At Org level 2.
Only the emacs-lisp block will *not* be tangled from this subtree.
#+name: block2
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(message "this block will *not* be tangled")
#+end_src
But the below Nim block will tangle fine (though incorrectly to the
foo.el file!). Though, the below /block3/ appears *above* /block1/ in
the tangled file foo.el.
#+name: block3
#+begin_src nim
echo "this block will be tangled to property_drawer2.nim"
#+end_src
=====
Tangling this (C-c C-v t) gives this foo.el file:
=====
echo "this block will be tangled to property_drawer2.nim"
(message "this will be tangled to property_drawer2.el")
=====
Ignoring that Nim code gets inserted into the Emacs-Lisp file because
of incorrect :tangle header-args under Heading 1, why is the block3
code appearing above block1?
Is this a bug?
Org mode version 9.1.14 (release_9.1.14-933-gfe72a0 @
/home/kmodi/usr_local/apps/6/emacs/master/share/emacs/site-lisp/org/)
--
Kaushal Modi
- [O] Order of tangled blocks reversed?,
Kaushal Modi <=