[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] BeOrg
|
From: |
Scott Randby |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] BeOrg |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2018 00:00:01 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
On 01/02/2018 09:43 PM, Ilya Shlyakhter wrote:
> "as a GNU package, we're not allowed to mention proprietary software"
> -- how is that consistent with GNU prominently distributing Emacs for
> Windows from its own website? I think this shows that the guideline
> is not absolute. And it's specifically phrased as a guideline
> ("should"), not as a requirement.
>
Emacs for Windows is still free software with source code and everything. BeOrg
is not free software.
Scott Randby
- [O] BeOrg, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Eric S Fraga, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, ilya shlyakhter, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Peter Davis, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Thomas S. Dye, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Ian Dunn, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2018/01/02
- Re: [O] BeOrg,
Scott Randby <=
- Re: [O] BeOrg, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2018/01/03
Re: [O] BeOrg, Tim Cross, 2018/01/03