emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Bug: org-table-separator-space breaks alignment of existing tabl


From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] Bug: org-table-separator-space breaks alignment of existing tables [9.1.5 (9.1.5-1-gb3ddb0-elpaplus @ /home/il/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171225/)]
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:32:51 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

Ingo Lohmar <address@hidden> writes:

> Here's a simple table example that breaks (info and columns lost etc) on
> `org-table-align`.  I traced it down to org-table-separator-space ---
> setting it to a plain " " (effectively the situation before the last
> 9.1.5 commit) works for me, but I do not understand why the change
> breaks that.  Or is this "breakage" expected?
>
> | No | Name            | cpr1 | drv1 | ?ch1 | fla1 | xt12 | enh       | pit1 
> | mtd1 | dly1 | xt11 | xt1 (2) | Amp [sd0 but def.3]  | Cab                   
>        |           Rev | Comment                        |    | WIP/TODO       
>                |
> |    |                 |      |      |      |      |      | rt/ph/trm |      
> |      |      |      |         |                      |                       
>        |               |                                |    |                
>                |
> |----+-----------------+------+------+------+------+------+-----------+------+------+------+------+---------+----------------------+------------------------------+---------------+--------------------------------+----+-------------------------------|
> |  0 | JC 120          |    4 |      |    8 |    2 |      |           |      
> |    4 |    2 | DlyIn 30-100% |         | brt m10              | 94 2x12 slv 
> alnico           |       sm room | 102bpm; orig ~CE-1 (more shimmer etc) |    
> |                               |

Confirmed. There is an issue in maint, but not in master, as far as my
testing goes.

Since we are close to Emacs release, I'd rather postpone this change, so
I reverted it in maint branch while keeping it in master.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]