.. and so on, and then one can have
:EXPORT_WITH_EMPHASIZE: t
or
:EXPORT_WITH_EMPHASIZE:
in the subtree property.
Is there a reason why this support wasn't added in the first place?
(Or does a method already exist to allow me to do the above?)
I can work on a patch if it's OK to enable this functionality.
From a quick testing, this works:
diff --git a/lisp/ox.el b/lisp/ox.el
index 4d3d7afb9d6..473608e82b2 100644
--- a/lisp/ox.el
+++ b/lisp/ox.el
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
(:with-date nil "date" org-export-with-date)
(:with-drawers nil "d" org-export-with-drawers)
(:with-email nil "email" org-export-with-email)
- (:with-emphasize nil "*" org-export-with-emphasize)
+ (:with-emphasize "EXPORT_WITH_EMPHASIZE" "*" org-export-with-emphasize)
(:with-entities nil "e" org-export-with-entities)
(:with-fixed-width nil ":" org-export-with-fixed-width)
(:with-footnotes nil "f" org-export-with-footnotes)
@@ -2924,7 +2924,7 @@ returned by the function."
?\s)))))
;; ... emphasis...
((bold italic strike-through underline)
- (and (not (plist-get info :with-emphasize))
+ (and (not (org-string-nw-p (plist-get info :with-emphasize)))
(let ((marker (cl-case (org-element-type datum)
(bold "*")
(italic "/")
I can have the same done for all options in a final patch.