[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle'
From: |
Alain . Cochard |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle' |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:48:02 +0200 |
Nicolas Goaziou writes on Tue 26 Sep 2017 12:41:
> Hello,
>
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > But now, compared to the previous version:
> >
> > When the cursor is at the beginning of the buffer and the
> > first line is not a headline, then <TAB> actually runs global
> > cycling
> >
> > it is not clear to me why the mention "and the first line is not
> > a headline" has been suppressed.
>
> I traded completeness for clarity.
>
> The reasoning is that the description about a pathological case --
> here, the first line of the buffer being a heading -- belongs to
> variable's docstring, not to the manual.
>
> We can add a footnote about that case, but even a footnote impedes
> clarity.
>
> Of course, if you have a clear wording that includes that
> pathological case, I'll happily use it.
OK, I understand your point, although I probably cannot fully
appreciate it because I do not know what a "docstring" is.
As for the wording, I have nothing ecstatic to propose, but -- as a
beginner and trying to think like one who is reading the manual for
the first time while experimenting -- I would have been happy with
something like:
You can run global cycling using <TAB> only if point is at the very
beginning of the buffer (not being a headline) and
`org-cycle-global-at-bob' is set to a non-`nil' value.
More generally, I cannot remember the number of times when I read the
manual, do not understand it, am essentially sure that it is wrongly
phrased but (just in case) spend a (too) long time searching the Web
before complaining to the list, to finally realize that "Ah OK, the
manual is fully correct."
In other words, the manual is often too concise/elegant for the
(admittedly not very smart) beginner that I am, and I would favor
completeness -- with footnotes, dumb examples to get started, more
cross-references, even repetitions -- over clarity.
But maybe that's just me...
Regards,
a.
--
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre)
IPG (Institut de Physique du Globe) | address@hidden
5 rue René Descartes [bureau 106] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44
F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France | Fax: +33 (0)3 68 85 01 25
- [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Alain . Cochard, 2017/09/18
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Matt Lundin, 2017/09/19
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/20
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Alain . Cochard, 2017/09/26
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/26
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle',
Alain . Cochard <=
- [O] org-list-empty-line-terminates-plain-lists removed but still mentioned in the manual, Alain . Cochard, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] org-list-empty-line-terminates-plain-lists removed but still mentioned in the manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Robert Horn, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Kyle Meyer, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Eric S Fraga, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Alain . Cochard, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Josiah Schwab, 2017/09/28
- Re: [O] Confused about the explanation for 'org-cycle', Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/28