Re: [O] [PATCH] Fix clocktable scope parameter

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,


Thank you. Some comments follow.

Eduardo Bellani <address@hidden> writes:

> org-clock.el: Fix clocktable scope parameter

Why is it a "fix"? I think this patch belongs to master branch, not
maint.

> * lisp/org-clock.el (org-dblock-write:clocktable): Funcall the scope
>   argument if it is a function.
>
> * doc/org.texi: Document the feature of using a function, both bounded
>   and as a lambda form, as the scope for the clocktable.

Since a bounded symbol and a lambda form are both functions, I'd rather
not distinguish them. Actually, this distinction is usually not made.
> +             symbol     @r{scan the files returned by calling the nullary 
> function bound to this symbol}
> +             lambda-form  @r{Same as above, but the nullary function is 
> passed as a lambda form.}

See above. I suggest:

  function @r{...}

> -                 ((pred consp) scope)
> +                    ((pred #'functionp) (funcall scope))

  (pred functionp)

> +                    ((pred listp) scope)

Is there any reason to change consp into listp? This change doesn't
appear in the commit message.


Could you provide an entry in ORG-NEWS? Also, would you mind writing
a couple of simple tests in test-org-clock.el?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou