[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures
From: |
Colin Baxter |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:28:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Colin Baxter <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>
>>> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> What is the failure in each case?
>>>
>> ---- snip ----
>>
>> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+0000)
>> 8 expected failures
>>
>> org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709
>> emacs-25.1.1; 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>
> It might be that emacs 26 shows the failures (both Marco Wahl and I are
> running that, but Colin Baxter runs emacs 25 and does not see them).
Unfortunately, the tests pass using emacs-26 too:
Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 21:21:38+0000)
8 expected failures
org-version: 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-288-g4caad0)
GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2017-02-11
Best wishes,
Colin.
- [O] Heads-up: test failures, Nick Dokos, 2017/02/13
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Marco Wahl, 2017/02/13
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/02/13
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Nick Dokos, 2017/02/13
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Colin Baxter, 2017/02/14
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Nick Dokos, 2017/02/14
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures,
Colin Baxter <=
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Nick Dokos, 2017/02/14
- Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, Colin Baxter, 2017/02/15
Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures, John Hendy, 2017/02/14