emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] org-agenda-filter-effort and "invalid face reference"


From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] org-agenda-filter-effort and "invalid face reference"
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:16:04 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

wtm <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm having trouble using org-agenda-filter-by-effort on existing
> agendas in orgmode 9.0.3 in GNU Emacs 25.1.1 ([x86_64-w64-mingw32] of
> 2016-09-17).  Each time I attempt to use org-agenda-filter-by-effort,
> I type "_" and then "=" and I select the one-digit index of the effort
> estimate I want--in my case, I select "3" which corresponds to "0:30".
>
> Instead of seeing only those orgmode TODO headings that have an effort
> property of "0:30" in the agenda buffer as I would expect, all the
> TODO headings disappear.  However, every other type of filter on the
> agenda buffer seems to work.  I can easily filter by category and tag.
> I have attempted this with my configuration and without any custom
> configuration at all and always gotten the same result.
>
> Although no errors occur (at least none that M-x toggle-debug-on-error
> pick up) the *Messages* buffer provides some feedback: "Invalid face
> reference: org-agenda-filter-effort [2 times]".

[...]

> I've attempted to reproduce the problem in Emacs 25.1.1 and orgmode
> 9.0.3 without any configuration and still experienced the same
> problem.  To reproduce the problem I think you'd only need to create
> an org file, add an entry with a TODO heading, and then assign an
> effort estimate that corresponds to the array of allowed values (see
> description of org-agenda-filter-by-effort http://bit.ly/2iF4o68).
> After that, you'd need to create an agenda by entering "C-c a"
> (org-agenda) and "t" (List all TODO entries).

I cannot reproduce it with, e.g.

  * TODO test
  :PROPERTIES:
  :Effort:   2:00
  :END:

and a bare configuration. Could you double-check you're really using Org
9.0.3?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]