[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Is it generally better practice to specify local variables at th
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Is it generally better practice to specify local variables at the first line for Org files? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:33:02 +0200 |
Hello,
Marco Wahl <address@hidden> writes:
> I have the same issue. Currently I try to have an extra eye on the
> bottommost org tree. I also use an extra tag to mark the org tree which
> should be bottommost. I also use the idea stated in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg106940.html which sorts
> the wanted org tree to the bottom when sorting.
>
> For me this works reasonably well.
>
> When you put the local variables to the top of the file you are on the
> save side AFAICT.
>
> I try to avoid too much information in the first line. I prefer to have
> the variables at the bottom.
Local variables at the end of the buffer are, indeed, a bit painful to
handle under Org. Org Footnote handles them reasonably well, I think,
but that's about it.
I would welcome a general solution to this, as long as it does not
impede speed of most basic Org commands.
Do you have an idea about it? Maybe a start would be to have a dedicated
Org version of `outline-next-heading' that moves before local variables
when it reaches the end of the buffer.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou