[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:31:40 +0200 |
Hello,
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
> The GOAL is to make "pretty" latex and not clutter every footnote with
> labels.
I understand that. I actually misread the code.
> I think the logic is better now, but it uses the plain
> org-export-map rather than org-export--footnote-reference-map.
The difference between `org-element-map' and
`org-export--footnote-reference-map' is about the order in which
footnotes references are processed. In this case, you don't care about
it, so `org-element-map' is probably a better choice.
> From: Rasmus <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 15:10:16 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ox-html: Find preamble-spec case-insensitively
You sent the wrong patch.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)], Rasmus, 2016/05/22
- Re: [O] Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)], Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/05/23
- [O] [patch] more robust footnotes (was: Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)]), Rasmus, 2016/05/24
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes, Rasmus, 2016/05/24
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/05/24
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes, Rasmus, 2016/05/25
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/05/25
- Re: [O] [patch] more robust footnotes, Rasmus, 2016/05/25