Re: [O] non-standard link errors

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Skip Collins <address@hidden> writes:

> I added this line to the top of my org file:
> #+OPTIONS: broken-links:t
>
> But that eliminates both the link and its description from the export.
> Changing it from 't' to 'mark' puts a BROKEN LINK message in the
> output. I suggest adding a new option 'pass' that would simply pass
> "broken" links verbatim into the output.

Not that I'm against the idea, but wouldn't it be a poor way to properly
fix the issue, i.e., add new link types?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou