Re: [O] what happened to :wrap HTML ?

[Giuseppe Lipari]

Hello,

:wrap export HTML is perfectly fine for me, and it opens more possibilities, so I am willing to upgrade my org files to the new syntax (they are not so many).

Thank you for the fast response,

Giuseppe Lipari

Le mer. 24 févr. 2016 à 23:56, Rasmus <address@hidden> a écrit :

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Giuseppe Lipari <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I used to generate html code with a python script using org-babel, like this:
>>>
>>> %------- example.org ---------%
>>> * This is an example of export in HTML
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results :results output :wrap HTML
>>> print "<ul> <li> first item</li>"
>>> print "<li> second item </li>"
>>> print "</ul>"
>>> #+END_SRC
>>> %------- example.org ---------%
>>>
>>> This used to work just fine and produce a nice unordered list in
>>> html. Until the moment I updated to the
>>> current development version:
>>>
>>> Org-mode version 8.3.4 (release_8.3.4-588-g924431 @ /home/lipari/elisp/org-mode/lisp/)
>>>
>>> Now, it produces the attached screenshot:
>>>
>>> snapshot
>>>
>>> Hence my question: what happened to ":wrap HTML" ?? Is there an equivalent way to express the same
>>> behaviour as before?
>>>
>>
>> I bet :wrap HTMP produces
>>
>> #+BEGIN_HTML
>> ...
>> #+END_HTML
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> #+BEGIN_EXPORT HTML
>> #+END_EXPORT
>
> So I guess the OP should write :wrap export HTML.
>
> We could also add the export part automatically, but that would limit
> the value of the parameter (e.g., impossible to do anything else than
> export blocks)

We need to allow special blocks.  But the question is whether we can
"guess" when something is a backend and do the right thing.  It’s probably
a "can of worms" to try to guess.

Rasmus

--
Nothing's wrong with an email that ends in a minor key