[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] "No link found" for <return> after <2016-02-21 Sun>
From: |
Josef Atmin |
Subject: |
Re: [O] "No link found" for <return> after <2016-02-21 Sun> |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:05:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Dear Nicolas!
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:34:21PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Josef Atmin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> when the curser is at the end of the line directly after <2016-02-21 Sun>,
> >> i.e. there
> >> comes a newline right after the '>', then typing <return> results in the
> >> message "No link
> >> found". I guess this is a bug.
>
> This is fixed in development version already (commit
> a87c34cb8d58e7019c8d081c02bbac9e93cef8ab).
Thanks for letting me know. I guess it will make it to the unstable release
soon.
So there remains my wishlist item, namely that typing <return> after a
link results in a newline rather than activation of the link. I would
find it much better if only a <return> on the link would activate it,
because I am often in the situation where I am at the end of a line
and I want to insert a newline, but because there is a link at the end
of the line right before the curser (not at the cursor), the link is
activated, which is mostly harmless but anoying. To avoid that, I
have to either first tiype a <space> and then a <return> or first
Ctrl-o and then <right>. But it is hard for me to always be aware of
the link and change my automatism of simply typing <return>.
I believe that this behavior has actually changed in one of the recent
versions. Can anybody point me to the discussion in which this change
(to activating the link upon <return> if the curser is behind the
link) was decided, so that I can understand the arguments for this
behavior that I personally don't like.
Best wishes,
Josef.