Re: [O] [lint] imagemagick

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:

> Exactly.  I guess my implicit question was, whether we should aim to
> make :imagemagick accept 'no' as nil to be consistent with the general
> org babel conventions.
>
> As I get it, you would say: no.

Not at all. My main concern was to fix the issue. This is another one.

We could accept "no" as nil. Patches welcome.

Meanwhile, we could also add a rule to `org-lint' warning about
deprecate use of "yes" and "no" and suggest to slowly switch to nil and
t, if that's really important.

-- 
Nicolas