[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Suggestion org-lint - Duplicate NAME
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Suggestion org-lint - Duplicate NAME |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:44:05 +0200 |
Hello,
Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
> I have a long org document in which I copied around some analysis blocks
> to do the same analysis (and format of results) for different simulation
> parameter combinations.
>
> But sometimes I forget to change the #+NAME: properties.
>
> org-lint is a gret help in finding these, but as my names are long and
> cryptic, it is not easy to see where the duplicates are. An example:
>
> ,----
> | 2442 high Duplicate NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2447 high Duplicate NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2451 high Duplicate NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2456 high Duplicate NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2480 high Duplicate NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2487 high Duplicate NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2491 high Duplicate NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2498 high Duplicate NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> `----
>
> was the output of the linting. Now it took me quite a few attempts
> (which were aborted by ignoring the problem) to see which ones are
> duplicates. It would be easier, if, in the case of duplicates, the
> entries could look as follow:
>
> ,----
> | 2442 high Duplicate (2442, 2480) NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2447 high Duplicate (2447, 2487) NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2451 high Duplicate (2451, 2491) NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2456 high Duplicate (2456, 2498) NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2480 high Duplicate (2442, 2480) NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2487 high Duplicate (2447, 2487) NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesOptimMahat"
> | 2491 high Duplicate (2451, 2491) NAME "fig_fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> | 2498 high Duplicate (2456, 2498) NAME "fig:fitEachExamplesUAOptimMahat"
> `----
>
> This would make it easier to find the duplicates, especially if they are
> not in adjacent messages.
It could potentially create very long, i.e., unreadable, warning
messages. Instead, you can now sort warning messages, which helps
putting together duplicate names.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou