Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode

[Thomas S . Dye]

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>>
>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
>
> I agree.  We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
> from latex-proper classes.  This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
>
> It’s a "relaxed" mode.  I’m not sure what a good term for this is.

Trial mode?

hth,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com