[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:23:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
>> Can this just be a variable set by BIND or publish?
>
> It could. If we keep throwing errors on unknown macros, I think we can
> even have an OPTIONS item.
I would be happier with this, I think.
>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>
> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
I agree. We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
from latex-proper classes. This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
It’s a "relaxed" mode. I’m not sure what a good term for this is.
Rasmus
--
Governments should be afraid of their people
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Thomas S . Dye, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric S Fraga, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nick Dokos, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/10
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/11
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/10/09