Re: [O] Scheme code block gives false error message

[Nick Dokos]

Lawrence Bottorff <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>  
>
>     > So it looks like Scheme is not a Babel language after all.
>    
>     What do you mean? There is an ob-scheme.el but it's buggy: I suspect
>     that every ob-*.el is buggy to some extent. Does that mean that every
>     language that babel supports is not a babel language?
>
> I only mean it can't be used as it now is. I was only three simple
> example code snippets into this when it proved inoperable. I wanted to
> use it as a study aid for HTDP or SICP or one of the other Scheme
> tutorials . . . as in make some personal comments around code
> samples.  
>
>     > Is there a formal "bug report" to do?
>    
>     Well, whether a formal bug report will help is not clear: it's probably
>     best that one be submitted if only for documentation purposes, but
>     whether it will be addressed or not very much depends on somebody
>     picking it up and fixing it. You might be able to persuade "Möbius"
>     to sign FSF papers and submit his implementation (but note that there
>     are limitations there, as mentioned on the page you linked - so there
>     will be bugs...)
>
> I keep putting off learning elisp. Maybe this is the "Schub" I
> need. You know, stop being such a needy org-mode tourist and start
> being a local. :-)
>

That would be ideal :-)

Did you try the alternative ob-scheme.el? If (when) you do, maybe you can post
some comments: would it be worth to pursue replacing the current one
with the alternative?

-- 
Nick