Re: [O] Scheme code block gives false error message

[Nick Dokos]

Lawrence Bottorff <address@hidden> writes:

> So it looks like Scheme is not a Babel language after all.

What do you mean? There is an ob-scheme.el but it's buggy: I suspect
that every ob-*.el is buggy to some extent. Does that mean that every
language that babel supports is not a babel language?

> Is there a formal "bug report" to do?

Well, whether a formal bug report will help is not clear: it's probably
best that one be submitted if only for documentation purposes, but
whether it will be addressed or not very much depends on somebody
picking it up and fixing it. You might be able to persuade "Möbius"
to sign FSF papers and submit his implementation (but note that there
are limitations there, as mentioned on the page you linked - so there
will be bugs...)

>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>     Lawrence Bottorff <address@hidden> writes:
>    
>     > I think this
>     > 
> (https://mobiusengineering.wordpress.com/2015/01/11/using-emacs-org-with-mit-scheme/)
>     > describes my problem. Basically, it's with ob-scheme.el. The article
>     > seems to say that my problem is scheme stuff being handled improperly
>     > by the elisp of ob-scheme.el.
>    
>     Yes, that sounds right.
>    
>     > I'll try his workaround and see if it works. He also seems to believe 
> Scheme is a second-class
>     > citizen in babel-land.
>     >
>    
>     --
>     Nick

-- 
Nick