[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Do you like to have your TODOs at the same headline level?
From: |
J. David Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Do you like to have your TODOs at the same headline level? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:08:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (cygwin) |
Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> writes:
> William Denton <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm trying to spend more time in a sparse tree view where I just see
>> TODOs (C-c / t). I didn't like having the TODOs at different levels
>> of indentation, though. I prefer seeing them all lined up, so I moved
>> them all to be fourth-level headline. It's visually pleasing, and
>> I don't care if a second-level headline has a fourth-level child
>> without a third-level one.
>>
>> Do other people do this?
>
> No, and I don't think that's sane. It would be logical to expect
> problems at export time (to LaTeX, among others) and in Org-lint.
>
> I try to put all the tasks at the 2nd level, the 1st level being
> reserved for big sections such as "Administration", "Tasks", "Team",
> etc.
>
> I'm very rigorous about expecting that all my "project management"
> documents can be exported (without loosing subtrees or generating error)
> to HTML (as the very first goal) and to LaTeX (as the second one).
>
> OTOH, I don't deny your wish to get things aligned; that's why I've
> opted to 4-char todo states only!
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
4-char todo states? How about a list? I can't picture how to abbreviate some
things...
Dave