[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] document depreciation of timeline?

From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] document depreciation of timeline?
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:54:00 +0200


Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:

> There are only two commits which mention the timeline in their
> summry lines in the newer git history since 2008-01-31.
> Shouldn't the feature then be officially depreciated and
> mentioned as stale in the manual?  The manual mentions the
> timeline in most cases together with the agenda.  And there is a
> small chapter dedicated to the timeline.
> If depreciation of the timeline is OK I would patch the manual
> accordingly.

I'm all for it. I think we shouldn't even document deprecated features
in the manual, otherwise, they just never go away.

In any case, Bastien will have the last word on the matter.


Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]