[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Is it possible to remove org-completing-read and org-completing-read
From: |
Oleh Krehel |
Subject: |
[O] Is it possible to remove org-completing-read and org-completing-read-no-i? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:23:31 +0200 |
Hi all,
I'd like to remove them in favor of using `org-icompleting-read'
everywhere (or better yet, `completing-read').
`org-completing-read-no-i' doesn't do much, is called twice and can be
replaced with a let binding wrapper.
`org-completing-read' could be updated this way:
(defmacro with-org-minibuffer-keys (&rest body)
"Minibuffer read with SPACE being a normal character."
`(let ((enable-recursive-minibuffers t)
(minibuffer-local-completion-map
(copy-keymap minibuffer-local-completion-map)))
(org-defkey minibuffer-local-completion-map " " 'self-insert-command)
(org-defkey minibuffer-local-completion-map "?" 'self-insert-command)
(org-defkey minibuffer-local-completion-map (kbd "C-c !")
'org-time-stamp-inactive)
,@body))
(with-org-minibuffer-keys
(org-icompleting-read args))
This change will simplify the code nicely. One example that bothers me
is `org-tags-completion-function': it's essentially a hacky closure that
relies on several dynamic variables being set:
`org-last-tags-completion-table' and
`org-add-colon-after-tag-completion' are implicit arguments to this
function.
With the proposed change, each use of `org-tags-completion-function'
will be in conjunction with `org-icompleting-read'. That means a new
function can be written:
(defun org-read-tags (tag-list &optional colon)
(let ((org-last-tags-completion-table tag-list)
(org-add-colon-after-tag-completion colon))
(org-icompleting-read
"Tag: " 'org-tags-completion-function
;; ...
)))
I think it's a better interface, since the coupling is now made
explicit, instead of having to remember to set
`org-last-tags-completion-table' and
`org-add-colon-after-tag-completion' each time
`org-tags-completion-function' is to be used.
An even better thing to do would be to use "lexical-binding: t", remove
`org-tags-completion-function' and have it be a real closure inside
`org-read-tags'. Is there any wish or effort to move Org to
lexical-binding? Adding it would allow us to get rid of those dynamic
variables and `org-tags-completion-function' altogether and have the
lambda enclose on tag-list and colon instead.
regards,
Oleh
- [O] Is it possible to remove org-completing-read and org-completing-read-no-i?,
Oleh Krehel <=