[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Links
|
From: |
Suvayu Ali |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] Links |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 2015 01:41:32 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:47:38AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
[... description of the issues trimmed ...]
> > Although, you still have to handle the ambiguous case for existing Org
> > files. Unless this double maintenance is cumbersome, I would vote for
> > introducing such a scheme.
>
> The double maintenance is not possible. Either we take into
> consideration the prefix or the heuristic rule above, and some links are
> going to break, or we allow to bypass it and it doesn't improve the
> situation.
This is tricky indeed. I guess the heuristic is the safest bet when it
comes to compatibility.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.