[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2015 12:40:22 +0200 |
Hello,
Titus von der Malsburg <address@hidden> writes:
> Capturing, refiling, and archiving all create a new entry at a target
> location. Yet each of these facilities has it’s own way to specify the
> target. Capture templates have the most powerful target specification
> and refiling and archiving are both fairly limited. For users that is
> confusing and it prevents them from getting the most out of org-mode. Is
> there a technical reason for why different target specifications are
> used or is it just historical? Wouldn’t it make sense to use just one
> target specification “language” and to use that everywhere?
Would you mind elaborating? What, exactly, are you suggesting?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving, Titus von der Malsburg, 2015/05/12
- Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving, Titus von der Malsburg, 2015/05/13
- Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/05/17
- Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving, Titus von der Malsburg, 2015/05/17
- Re: [O] Capturing, refiling, archiving, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/05/17