[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda
From: |
Daniel Borchmann |
Subject: |
[O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda |
Date: |
Fri, 01 May 2015 23:19:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Dear all,
I regularly lose all my filters when I bury a sticky agenda and revive
it later. In that case, the variable `org-agenda-tag-filter' is set to
nil, although it was non-nil before burying.
I played around a bit, and found out that `org-agenda-tag-filter' is
buffer-local (which is not a surprise). When the agenda buffer is
revived, the function `org-agenda-prepare' is called, which, among
others, should reset the filters (provided that
`org-agenda-persistent-filter' is set). The beginning of the function
is
--->8---
(defun org-agenda-prepare (&optional name)
(let ((filter-alist (if org-agenda-persistent-filter
(list `(tag . ,org-agenda-tag-filter)
`(re . ,org-agenda-regexp-filter)
`(car . ,org-agenda-category-filter)))))
...))
---8<---
It seems to me that `org-agenda-tag-filter' is read *before* the old
agenda buffer is poped up (i.e., made current), and thus results in a
`nil' value. Indeed, if I replace the definition of `filter-alist' by
--->8---
(let ((filter-alist (if org-agenda-persistent-filter
(with-current-buffer
(get-buffer org-agenda-buffer-name)
(list `(tag . ,org-agenda-tag-filter)
`(re . ,org-agenda-regexp-filter)
`(car . ,org-agenda-category-filter))))))
...)
---8<---
then the bug (seems to) disappear.
My question is now: is this correct, or did I understand something
wrong? If my understanding is correct, how this bug be fixed more
elegantly?
Best,
Daniel
--
Daniel Borchmann http://daniel.kxpq.de
GPG (Mail) 0849 473E 6BF0 B504 DF0B D640 455E 3610 01FF 778F
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda,
Daniel Borchmann <=