[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)
|
From: |
Gregor Zattler |
|
Subject: |
[O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:05:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hi Nicolas,,
* Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> [30. Apr. 2015]:
> * Nicolas Richard <address@hidden> [30. Apr. 2015]:
> > I think this specific bug was fixed in :
> > Commit ea575950d957fcecc74ed6f53c29bb6b77e9fe26
>
> Sorry, no:
> with:
> GNU Emacs 25.0.50.6 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.5) of
> 2015-04-27 on boo Org-mode version 8.3beta (release_8.3beta-1097-gea5759 @
> /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
>
> and emacs invoked with -Q I cannot save a modified file with ^x ^s
> but when I leave emacs:
>
> receipt:
> emacs -Q -nw /tmp/tempfile
>
> change buffer, do ^x ^s.
I redid my test and now it works... Probably I forgot the -Q.
Sorry for the noise, Gregor
--
-... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-
- [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
- [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer", Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Bastien, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Nicolas Richard, 2015/04/30
- [O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected),
Gregor Zattler <=
- [O] now it get's ridiculous: bug is still there (was: Re: wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
Re: [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Bastien Guerry, 2015/04/30