[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:10:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>> To have a defcustom that let you choose preferred method. Whether the
>> default should be changed I don't know.
>
> We don't need a defcustom if we can assign a different keybinding to
> each of them.
Perhaps. Unless C-c C-c should reflect "my" preferred method.
>>> This is not possible ATM because it doesn't handle inline footnotes at
>>> all (this requires some work in "org-src.el", since
>>> `org-src--edit-element' wasn't designed to edit inline objects), and,
>>
>> There's no need IMO. ATM it moves to the second colon and I don't see
>> other logical ways to handle it.
>
> You can reference inline footnotes too:
>
> [fn:label] refers to [fn:label:definition]
>
> and you may want to edit definition from [fn:label].
Right. I had not thought of that.
>> C-c C-c would then depend on a defcustom, I guess. At least it's a pity
>> if C-c C-c only works in some cases, e.g. "if not narrowed".
>
> If remote editing is improved, it can become the default for C-c C-c
> when on a footnote reference. C-c C-o can jump between the definition
> and the reference. We can remove C-c '.
I guess that's fine. Still, someone who never uses narrows may find jump
better, especially for short documents. If the org-src window can be
configured to show less than a fullscreen I guess I would have no concerns
with this proposal.
Thanks,
Rasmus
--
There are known knowns; there are things we know that we know
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, (continued)
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/25
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/25
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/25
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/25
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/25
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/26
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/26
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Rasmus, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/27