[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-latex question
From: |
Vikas Rawal |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-latex question |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:35:55 +0530 |
>
>> True. This is because org-latex-headline is written this way:
>>
>> ,----
>> | (if (and numberedp opt-title
>> | ;; ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ why this? Maybe there's a good reason...
>> | (not (equal opt-title full-text))
>> | (string-match "\\`\\\\\\(.*?[^*]\\){" section-fmt))
>> | (...)
>> | ;; Impossible to add an alternative heading. Fallback to
>> | ;; regular sectioning format string.
>> | (format section-fmt full-text
>> | (concat headline-label pre-blanks contents)))
>> `----
>>
>> However, it need not be this way: LaTeX itself (or more precisely: the
>> default classes) seem to support the alt-title even for starred
>> sectioning commands.
>
> I removed NUMBEREDP, since I cannot remember the reason for its
> presence.
>
Sorry, it took me some time before I could get back to figure this out.
In the document (manuscript of a book) that I am working, ALT_TITLE now works
in most cases. However, ALT_TITLE does not work for headlines in Appendices,
which come after
\begin{appendices}
Just as a reminder (since these emails are several days old), we are trying to
enable ALT_TITLE in all headlines irrespective of whether they appear in TOC or
not.
So there is perhaps still a problem somewhere.
Vikas
- [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/11
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/12
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/12
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/04/12
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/12
- Re: [O] org-latex question,
Vikas Rawal <=
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nick Dokos, 2015/04/27
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Vikas Rawal, 2015/04/28
- Re: [O] org-latex question, Nick Dokos, 2015/04/28