emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Org 8 Bug in interactive formula editing mode?


From: Nick Dokos
Subject: Re: [O] Org 8 Bug in interactive formula editing mode?
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:19:14 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)

Thorsten Grothe <address@hidden> writes:

> Nick,
>
>> Nope - I tried to reproduce it with latest (both master and maint) and
>> could not, so I suspect an error in your configuration.
>
> I think I found the problem, it happened after I patched the file with your
> patch from the thread above:
>
> #####
> diff --git a/lisp/org-table.el b/lisp/org-table.el
> index d7ef615..864493e 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-table.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-table.el
> @@ -447,8 +447,8 @@ available parameters."
>    "Check if the table has a marking column.
>  If yes remove the column and the special lines."
>    (let ((special (if maybe-quoted
> -                  "^[ \t]*| *\\\\?[\#!$*_^/ ] *|"
> -                "^[ \t]*| *[\#!$*_^/ ] *|"))
> +                  "^[ \t]*| *\\\\?[\#!$*_^/] *|"
> +                "^[ \t]*| *[\#!$*_^/] *|"))
>       (ignore  (if maybe-quoted
>                    "^[ \t]*| *\\\\?[!$_^/] *|"
>                  "^[ \t]*| *[!$_^/] *|")))
> ####
>
> I tried to recover the saved file table.el.orig and everything works fine, so 
> it
> is something with the patch, right? What did I wrong ??
>

I'm running latest maint currently (which includeds the patch) and
I don't have that problem, so I'd say no, there's nothing wrong with
the patch (famous last words).

I don't understand what you did exactly: you installed a new version.
Does that version include the patch? Check org-table.el around line 439:
if the function just has a `lines' argument then it most likely includes
the patch. I hope you did not try to apply the patch on top of that.
If you did, go back, throw away the patch file (it's not useful any
longer), and reinstall.

If the version you installed does *not* have the patch, why would it
have *this* problem? It would exhibit the *different* problem
that you brought up earlier: deleting columns on export.

Nick







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]