[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-babel, lilypond, & tables
From: |
Grant Rettke |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-babel, lilypond, & tables |
Date: |
Thu, 1 May 2014 14:15:05 -0500 |
Perhaps you are doing cutting edge stuff that no one has even
considered before, which is great.
Grant Rettke | AAAS, ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM, Sigma Xi
address@hidden | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Steven Arntson
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm wondering if someone could tell me if this idea is impossible. I'm
> trying to find a way to leverage org-tables in a document containing
> lilypond markup for a piano part such that both staves occupy the same
> line, visually (instead of the lefthand notes occupying the top of the
> doc and the righthand notes occupying the bottom). Right now I'm
> accomplishing this with a vertical split in the buffer, which works, but
> is clunky. I'd love to do something like:
>
> left hand | right hand | measure
> ------------------+---------------------+----------
> a16 b c d e f g a | a8 <b d f> e4~ | %m1
> <c e gs>4 a8 g | <e g c'>4 <g d b> | %m2
>
> et cetera. This is easy enough to lay out in org mode, and it would look
> terrific, but I can't imagine how to accomplish it such that the
> lilypond markup would respond correctly to ly-tangle without bracketing
> every cell in #+BEGIN_SRC LILYPOND #END_SRC (and even then, I doubt what
> would happen.)
>
> Maybe the answer is "You just have to get used to the way things are,"
> which is fine--even that would at least get me thinking about other
> problems.
>
> Thank you!
> Steven Arntson
>
>
- Re: [O] org-babel, lilypond, & tables,
Grant Rettke <=