[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] State of the art in citations
From: |
Ken Mankoff |
Subject: |
Re: [O] State of the art in citations |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:10:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.5; emacs 24.3.1 |
On 2014-04-27 at 12:05, Clément B. wrote:
>> Still looking into "lastname (Year)" format...
>
> I hadn't noticed that before, but now that you mention it, I
> think this is related to the way you format your bib file.
>
> For example "%A (%y)" with:
>
> 1. name = {Darwin, Charles}
> year = {1859}
>
> will yield "Darwin (1859)"
>
>
> 2. name = {Charles Darwin}
> year = {1859}
>
> will yield "Charles Darwin (1859)
>
> Not very consistent. This might be something to take to the AUCTeX
>guys.
I've asked about this here:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/173804/best-practices-for-bibtex-author-field
Maybe bibtool or some other tool can reformat my BibTeX
file to "Last, First".
-k.
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, (continued)
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/26
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Leonard Randall, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Thomas S. Dye, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27