Re: [O] org-review-schedule

[Alan Schmitt]

Hi Bastien,

Thanks a lot for these, I'll look into them. I have a couple questions
in the meantime.

On 2014-04-19 10:14, Bastien <address@hidden> writes:

> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
>   instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
>   will not create false positives by inserting entries with
>   a REVIEW property.

OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda, and I don't
see how it could interfere. (I like inactive time stamps because I can
easily adjust their dates with C-left and C-right, is it possible to do
so with naked timestamps?)

> - I infer from a quick read that this works for the agenda but
>   I guess this could work for both the agenda and Org buffers;

Yes, clearly.

> Since you took inspirationg from org-expiry, I guess some of
> the comments above would apply there too... feel free to hack
> into this directions for both org-expiry.el and org-review.el!
> Actually, maybe both should be merged somehow, since expiring
> is just reviewing entries to interactively delete them.

Yes. But I should think about it more to see where I could take this.

Thanks again,

Alan