emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?


From: Sebastien Vauban
Subject: Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:43:03 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt)

Hello Bastien and Thomas,

Bastien wrote:
> thanks for starting this list.
>
> address@hidden (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> C-c ! Creating timestamps
>> C-c . Creating timestamps
>> C-c # Checkboxes
>> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files,
>> editing source code, cooperation
>> C-c , Priorities
>> C-c ; Comment lines
>> C-c ? Editing and debugging formulas
>> C-c @ Structure editing 
>> C-c ^ Structure editing, plain lists, built-in table editor
>> C-c ` Built-in table editor
>> C-c ~ Cooperation
>
> (There is also C-c : (to add QUOTE) but doomed to disappear anyway.)

What about `C-c {' and such in the tables?

> I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version.
>
> For example:
>
> C-c # Checkboxes
>
> would be
>
> C-c C-# Checkboxes
>
> this would work for all of them except C-c ^ beause C-c C-^ is
> already bound to org-up-element.  Maybe it can move to C-c M-^
> instead (but that's one of the keybindings that is deeply into
> my memory.)

So is it for me. As half of the above mentioned key bindings -- the
other half, I don't know/use it.

> How would everyone feel about moving those keybindings to comply
> more closely with Emacs coding recommendations?

I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will
allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's
do it.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]