Re: [O] [BUG] Colored tags generate an error when C-x C-w'ing the agenda

[Carsten Dominik]

On Sep 27, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On 11.9.2013, at 14:48, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> If you have colors for tags:
>>> 
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> ;; faces for specific tags
>>> (setq org-tag-faces
>>>       '(("home" .
>>>          (:slant italic
>>>           :foreground "#5C88D3" :background "#BBDDFF"))
>>>         ("work" .
>>>          (:slant italic
>>>           :foreground "#5F7C43" :background "#C1D996"))))
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>> 
>>> you can't export the agenda views anymore; they all generate the following
>>> error:
>> 
>> It does seem to work if you specify the faces like this (without the dot).
>> 
>> (setq org-tag-faces
>>       '(("home" 
>>          (:slant italic
>>           :foreground "#5C88D3" :background "#BBDDFF"))
>>         ("work" 
>>          (:slant italic
>>           :foreground "#5F7C43" :background "#C1D996"))))
> 
> Without the dot [1], I confirm that I can export both to HTML and PDF with no
> error.
> 
> Though, in the PDF, these tags have a white background, not the one specified.
> This is a small annoyance...
> 
>> Since Emacs does display correctly with this way to specify a font, I'd say
>> this is a bug in ps-print and should be reported to Emacs as such.
> 
> ... which I'll report (with your analysis) to Emacs.

Thank you!

- Carsten

> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Best regards,
>  Seb
> 
> [1] I'd never ever have thought to remove the "dot". How did you discover or
> know that?
> 
> -- 
> Sebastien Vauban
> 
>

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail