[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Xemacs 21.5.32 and org-8.03, compilation problems
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Xemacs 21.5.32 and org-8.03, compilation problems |
Date: |
Thu, 30 May 2013 22:33:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.5-b32 (linux) |
>> "Achim" ==Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> I know that compiling org under Xemacs is delicate. I succeeded with
>> 7.8.3 but it seems that the installation process has changed quite a
>> bit.
> No, not really.
Ok, good
>> I edit the relevant
>>
>> default.mk
>> file (OK I should not do that but create local.mk)
>>
>> EMACS=/usr/local/bin/xemacs
>> BATCH = $(EMACS) -batch -vanilla # Xemacs
> Yes, you should not do this. A configuration file for XEmacs is here:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-build-system.html#sec-4-1-4
Thanks!
>> Now when running make the following problems showed up:
> You're not using the sources you think you are using.
That was a little my feeling.
>> Did anybody sucessfully compile the latest org version under
>> Xemacs 21.5.X?
> No, despite repeated calls for help no feedback from actual XEmacs users
> was registered and at some point I've stopped bugging Bastien about the
> incompatibilities introduced. There are at least a handful of functions
> that'd need compatibility macros /defuns on XEmacs and I don't know what
> turns up when these are out of the way, but the results were sketchy
> already on 7.x whenever I tried. Your best bet is running uncompiled
> (which probably still needs compatibility definitions).
You are right, this is a sad fact but true. The only person who cared,
and knows enough Lisp is Michael Sperber, who right now is very busy.
Actually I am right now very busy my self, but maybe in the next days I
give it another try, now that you sent me this information!
Thanks and regards
Uwe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature