[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] GFDL
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] GFDL |
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 2013 12:27:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ben,
Ben Finney <address@hidden> writes:
>> It bothers me mostly for the guide, where I did spend a lot of time to
>> make it compact, and now something like one fifth of it is license
>> text. We may actually consider to re-release the guide under a
>> different license.
>
> Please use this as an opportunity to seriously consider relicensing the
> entire work (programs, documentation, etc.) of Org-mode under the same
> license: the GNU GPL. It does not have the special problems of the FDL,
> and having the whole work under the same license terms makes it simpler
> and clearer.
Well, relicensing the Org compact guide under GNU GPL is definitely
feasible, but relicensing the Org manual is (sadly) not. Let's take
the feasible step first?
--
Bastien
- Re: [O] GFDL, Ben Finney, 2013/05/20
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, Ben Finney, 2013/05/25
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/05/27
- [O] [OT] Contributors to org.texi (was: GFDL), Memnon Anon, 2013/05/21