|
From: | Simon Thum |
Subject: | Re: [O] ical2org.py |
Date: | Thu, 16 May 2013 21:41:40 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130506 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 05/15/2013 10:01 AM, aitor wrote:
Similar here, I just checked Worg. However I had some special wishes unlikely to be covered, so I was prepared to hack anyway.Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:56:02AM +0200, Bastien wrote:Hi Simon, Simon Thum <address@hidden> writes:It's going to be confusing if we add them all.On the contrary -- I think collecting all the information about various solutions in the same place is the only way to encourage comparisons, which is the best way to let one solution emerge, if needed.indeed. Should I've known there were already so many implementations of ical2org I wouldn't have created mine! Silly thing is, it never ocurred to me to just search "ical2org" on google.
I recall to have lost my worg pushability, Bastien can you check? I would reorganize this a bit to make it clearer, and do not want to push something just to know.
@aitor if you have some info how your impl compares let the list know. Cheers, Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |