[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter
From: |
Viktor Rosenfeld |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter |
Date: |
Sun, 5 May 2013 15:27:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi Rasmus and Alan,
I've changed the code so the value for foldmarks is passed through to
KOMA-Script. It's a bit ugly insofar as one has to specify
foldmarks:true to use the default values instead of other options, such
as backaddress:t. However, subject also uses a string already.
See the attached patch.
Cheers,
Viktor
Rasmus wrote:
> Viktor Rosenfeld <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Yeah, I guess it's true. Still, since foldmarks depends on which
> >> envelopes you have at hand it might make sense to have it accept a
> >> string. In lisp-terms a string is still t. On the other hand the
> >> current approach is consistent with your approach above so that's a
> >> merit.
> >
> > The more I think about it the more I agree that you should be able to
> > set any value of foldmarks. The only problem I see is that for other
> > boolean options one can use `t' whereas for foldmarks one would need to
> > use `true' (because `t' is a valid configuration value for foldmarks).
> > But as long as that's documented I see no problem. I will post a patch,
> > once Alan applies my previous patches.
>
> I don't know the details of the exporter well enough on this detail,
> but perhaps it can be utilized that t ≠ "t"; if that's true in the
> exporter as well. In normal lisp (characterp "t") => t and
> (characterp t) nil. But I'm not sure if t would be transformed before
> being able to check. . .
>
> Thanks,
> Rasmus
>
> --
> May the Force be with you
>
0002-ox-koma-letter.el-Give-the-user-complete-control-ove.patch
Description: Text document