[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug in new exporter with babel blocks
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug in new exporter with babel blocks |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:32:04 +0200 |
Hello,
Aaron Ecay <address@hidden> writes:
> 2013ko urtarrilak 23an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>> You needn't. org-exp-blocks functionalities are supported by the new
>> exporter out of the box.
>
> Can you say more about this? I looked for but did not find a
> replacement to the org-export-blocks variable (an alist associating
> block types with functions to export them). I found it very easy to
> hook into the new exporter, but perhaps I missed something?
No, you didn't miss anything. I was thinking about
`org-special-blocks.el'. The exporter doesn't implement org-exp-blocks
functionalities.
Though, IIRC, org-exp-blocks was mostly deprecated when Babel was
introduced. That's why old ditaa and dot "exp-blocks" were moved to src
block languages.
> For parsing, yes. But for export I want a way to say “I don’t care what
> Org thinks the export of this block is. Give me the raw contents, and I
> will tell you what the export should be.”
>
> This is how the ditaa special-block code used to work; I see that it has
> now morphed into a babel language, which makes some kind of sense. I’m
> not sure it does in general.
>
> My use case is glossed examples for linguistics: my special block
> contains three lines, which are a sentence in a foreign language and a
> translation. By inserting markup in a way which is easy to automate,
> you can get LaTeX to align the words of one language with the words of
> the other. I don’t want any org processing of the text of the examples:
> it might contain backslashes, stars, etc., all of which should be passed
> verbatim to LaTeX. This does not feel like source code, it cannot be
> evaluated or tangled, I would not want these blocks to be included in
> org-babel-next-src-block, etc.
It is data. Source code is for the processing function.
Anyway, just store your text in example blocks, and create a src block
in any language to do the processing. Then you can call the processing
function on all of your example blocks.
I suggest to keep the example blocks in a non-exportable section. You
can also remove all named example blocks before export, via a hook. Your
call.
#+begin_src org
* Data
:noexport:
#+name: words
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
a b c
#+END_EXAMPLE
#+name:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=words
(upcase x)
#+END_SRC
* Contents
#+call: words(:var x=words)
#+end_src
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [O] Bug in new exporter with babel blocks,
Nicolas Goaziou <=