Re: [O] [BUG] ob-sql.el: probably an extra paren

[Bastien]

Hi,

Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:

> Hudson.  However, I don't think that a CI framework is what we need or
> want.  As I said, simply running the tests (preferrably with two different
> versions of Emacs) should be enough for now.  Unless we hear from Jason if
> he thinks the server can take the extra load its a moot point to discuss
> details, but I think this can be done in one of the Git hooks (much like
> Worg triggers publishing).

Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala <address@hidden> writes:

> About hudson/jenkins (any other CI), If we have resources on the server, I
> would say we should go for it.  That will remove Bastien's concern of slowing
> down development because of running tests by hand.

I'm copying Jason -- the idea is to run tests on the servers via a Git
hook, the same way that a Git hook publishes Worg.  If the tests fail,
the committer would get a warning and the commit would be discarded.

Jason, do you think it's feasible?  Enough?  I guess hudson/travis
is really too much for our needs.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien