[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] GFDL
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [O] GFDL |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:06:12 +0100 |
Dnia 2013-03-19, o godz. 07:44:51
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> napisaĆ(a):
> Hi Alan,
>
> thanks for chiming in. As Achim quoted, the GFLD says that the
> license should be in the document, but that makes the GFDL almost
> unfit for anything below a book.
>
> I have asked RMS about this, and he says that the license should be
> present in printed versions of the document. I find it very hard to
> believe that this must be the case. It bothers me mostly for the
> guide, where I did spend a lot of time to make it compact, and now
> something like one fifth of it is license text. We may actually
> consider to re-release the guide under a different license.
Just a n00b's (and IANAL's) 2cents here: what about including the GFDL
in, say 5pt font? Yes, it is awful, but at least does not take up
dozens of pages...
> Will try to find a solution here.
>
> - Carsten
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Re: [O] GFDL, (continued)
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Alan L Tyree, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/20
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/20
- Re: [O] GFDL, Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/20
- Re: [O] GFDL, Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/20